White v. Clark
| Demond Antione White |
| Harold Clark |
| 1:2022cv00951 |
| August 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Rossie D Alston |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Bivens Prisoner |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDERED that petitioner's motions to proceed in forma pauperis [Dkt. No. 2] be and is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the petition be and is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with leave to submit to this Court the required $5.00 filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Should petitioner submit the full filing fee within thirty (30) days, the Clerk shall reopen the petition. To appeal this decision, petitioner must file a written notice of appeal with the Clerk's office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order (see Order for details). Signed by District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr on 10/4/2022. (show) (c/s pursuant to Order) Modified docket text on 10/6/2022 (show).
|
|
THIS COURT EXPRESSLY DECLINES TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. (show)
|
|
Filing 8
Memorandum of law in support to #7 AMENDED petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(show)
|
|
Filing 7
AMENDED petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Demond Antione White. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(show)
|
|
Filing 6
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(show)
|
|
Filing 5
Consent to Collection of Fees. (show)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDERED that the petition be and is conditionally filed pending compliance with the requirements of this Order; and it is further ORDERED that petitioner is assessed a filing fee of $5.00 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1914(a); and it is further ORDERED that White particularize and amend his petition within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order by thoroughly completing the attached form for filing a federal petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 (See Order for Details). Signed by District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr on 8/31/2022. (Attachments: #1 2254 Form, #2 Inmate Account Report Form, #3 Inmate Trust Account Form) (show) (c/s to Plaintiff pursuant to Order)
|
|
Filing 3
Acknowledgment of Receipt. (kgall) (C/S to plaintiff)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Demond Antione White. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kgall)
|
|
Filing 1
Prisoner COMPLAINT against Harold Clark, filed by Demond Antione White. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Prisoner Data Sheet, #3 Envelope)(kgall)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: White v. Clark | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Demond Antione White | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Harold Clark | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
