Iturralde et al v. Jaddou
| Yelitza Luna Iturralde and Lugerio Moron Parraga |
| Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
| 1:2022cv00983 |
| August 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Anthony J Trenga |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed as to USA or Summons Returned Unexecuted as to USA. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Lawsuit)(kgall) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Anthony J Trenga and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (kgall) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Yelitza Luna Iturralde, Lugerio Moron Parraga. (Goodman, John) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8544169.), filed by Lugerio Moron Parraga, Yelitza Luna Iturralde. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, I-130 Receipt Notice, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goodman, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
