Ewers v. Peraton, Inc.
| Anthony Ewers |
| Peraton, Inc. and Peraton, Inc |
| 1:2022cv01374 |
| December 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| William E Fitzpatrick |
| Anthony J Trenga |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDERED that Defendant's Consent Motion to Set Aside Default and Extend Time to File a Responsive Pleading (Dkt. 9) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; it is further ORDERED that Defendant is permitted to late-file its response to the Complaint on or before February 10, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Fitzpatrick on 1/26/2023. (swil)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Richard Ward, III on behalf of Peraton, Inc. (Ward, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 Waiver of re #9 Consent MOTION to Set Aside Default and Extend Time to File Responsive Pleading by Peraton, Inc. (Ward, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION to Set Aside Default and Extend Time to File Responsive Pleading by Peraton, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order)(Ward, Joseph) |
|
Filing 8
ORDERED that Plaintiff immediately obtain a default from the Clerk pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a); and it is further ORDERED that promptly after obtaining entry of default, Plaintiff file a motion for default judgment and an accompanying memorandum and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff file a Notice setting the hearing on the motion for default judgment for 10:00 a.m. on Friday, February 24, 2023, before the magistrate judge to whom this action is referred and mail and email copies of the notice, motion, and memorandum to the Defendants at their last known addresses, certifying the same to the Court. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 1/24/2023. (show)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed David Isaac Moulton for Anthony Ewers. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 1/5/2023. (swil)
|
| Filing 6 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by David Isaac Moulton and Certification of Local Counsel Zev Antell Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-8738867. by Anthony Ewers. (Antell, Zev) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anthony Ewers Peraton, Inc. served on 12/29/2022, answer due 1/19/2023 (Antell, Zev) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Anthony Ewers (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1. Consent of Jaymar Rodriguez)(Antell, Zev) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Peraton, Inc., NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Summons Notice)(swil) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Anthony J Trenga and Magistrate Judge William E. Fitzpatrick. (swil) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Anthony Ewers. (Antell, Zev) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8689408.), filed by Anthony Ewers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent of Anthony Ewers, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Antell, Zev) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
