Lodhi v. Hobson et al
Plaintiff: Saad Usman Lodhi
Defendant: Kimberly Hobson, Department of Corrections of Virginia, Detective Doug Comfort and Fairfax County Police Department
Case Number: 1:2023cv00131
Filed: January 30, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: William E Fitzpatrick
Referring Judge: Claude M Hilton
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDERED that Plaintiff's request to issue subpoenas duces tecum to Defendants Virginia Department of Corrections, Kimberly Hobson, and Doug Comfort, received by the Court clerks office on January 31, 2023, is DENIED, with leave to request the subpoenas once discovery is permitted by the Federal Rules, stipulation of the parties, or order of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Fitzpatrick on 2/1/2023. (show)
February 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Fitzpatrick on 2/1/2023. (show)
February 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Pro Se E-Noticing. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Fitzpatrick on 02/01/2023. (jlan)
January 30, 2023 Filing 4 Letter to the court filed by Saad Usman Lodhi. (show)
January 30, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION for Pro Se E-Noticing filed by Saad Usman Lodhi. (show)
January 30, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Saad Usman Lodhi. (show)
January 30, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Detective Doug Comfort, Department of Corrections of Virginia, Fairfax County Police Department, Kimberly Hobson, filed by Saad Usman Lodhi. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(show)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lodhi v. Hobson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Saad Usman Lodhi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kimberly Hobson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Corrections of Virginia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Detective Doug Comfort
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fairfax County Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?