Lacey v. Wavy TV 10 on Your Side NBC et al
Michael E. Lacey |
Wavy TV 10 on Your Side NBC and Kayla Gaskins |
1:2023cv00286 |
March 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Rossie D Alston |
William E Fitzpatrick |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Bivens Prisoner |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Letter to the Court filed by Michael E. Lacey. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(swil) |
Filing 4 ORDERED that this action be and is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), for failure to pay the full statutory filing fee of $350.00 and the administrative fee of $50.00. Should Plaintiff submit the full filing fee and the administrative fee within thirty (30) days of this Order, the Clerk shall reopen this action; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis [Dkt. No. 2] is DENIED (see Order for further details). Signed by District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr on 3/13/2023. (swil) |
Filing 3 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (swil) |
Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael E. Lacey. (swil) |
Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Kayla Gaskins, Wavy TV 10 on Your Side NBC, filed by Michael E. Lacey. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Damages, #3 Prisoner Data Sheet, #4 Envelope)(swil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.