Fuentes v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Rommel Fuentes |
Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber USA, LLC, Rasier, LLC, Uber Insurance Services, LLC and Kehinde Idogho Micah |
1:2023cv00458 |
April 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Rossie D Alston |
Lindsey R Vaala |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Libel, Assault, Slander |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set Deadline as to #12 MOTION to Dismiss. Motion Hearing set for 8/2/2023 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 1000 before District Judge Rossie D. Alston Jr. (wgar, ) |
Filing 17 Notice of Hearing Date re #14 Opposition, #15 Memorandum in Opposition (Duncanson, Michael) |
Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion re #12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Rasier, LLC, Uber Insurance Services, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber USA, LLC. (Moore, Peter) |
Filing 15 Memorandum in Opposition re #12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Rommel Fuentes. (Duncanson, Michael) |
Filing 14 Opposition to #12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Rommel Fuentes. (Attachments: #1 Proprosed Order)(Duncanson, Michael) |
Filing 13 Memorandum in Support re #12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Rasier, LLC, Uber Insurance Services, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber USA, LLC. (Palenski, John) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss by Rasier, LLC, Uber Insurance Services, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber USA, LLC. (Palenski, John) |
Filing 11 ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and any documents filed in support must be filed no later than April 25, 2023; Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss must be filed no later than May 12, 2023; Defendants' Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss must be filed no later than May 19, 2023. Signed by District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr on 4/21/2023. (nlop) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeff Gaull on behalf of Rasier, LLC, Uber Insurance Services, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber USA, LLC (Gaull, Jeff) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by John Palenski on behalf of Rasier, LLC, Uber Insurance Services, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber USA, LLC (Palenski, John) |
Filing 8 Joint Briefing Schedule Proposal by Rasier, LLC, Uber Insurance Services, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber USA, LLC re #7 ORDER, (Moore, Peter). Modified to correct docket event on 4/17/2023 (Dest). |
Filing 7 ORDERED that the parties submit a joint proposal regarding the timeline for Defendants' response to the Complaint and any corresponding briefing, if necessary. The parties must submit such report no later than April 19, 2023. Signed by District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr on 4/12/2023. (nlop) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Duncanson on behalf of Rommel Fuentes (Duncanson, Michael) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr and Magistrate Judge Lindsey R. Vaala. (Sbro) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Uber Insurance Services, LLC. (Moore, Peter) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Rasier, LLC. (Moore, Peter) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Uber USA, LLC. (Moore, Peter) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Moore, Peter) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8881434.), filed by Rasier, LLC, Uber USA, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber Insurance Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Plaintiff's Complaint, #3 Exhibit 2 - Uber Defendants' Demurrer)(Moore, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.