Elhassan v. Arlington Asylum Office et al
| Mohammed E. Elhassan |
| Arlington Asylum Office and US Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 1:2023cv00579 |
| May 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| William E Fitzpatrick |
| Claude M Hilton |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED in re Plaintiff's Request to Dismiss the Federal Lawsuit. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 06/14/2023. (dvanm)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Anne Spavins on behalf of Arlington Asylum Office, US Citizenship and Immigration Services (Spavins, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 3 Letter Motion to the Court filed by Mohammed E. Elhassan. (swil) Modified to correct docket event on 5/22/2023 (swil). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued to be served via certified mail as to Arlington Asylum Office, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Dest) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Arlington Asylum Office, US Citizenship and Immigration Services ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 100001991.), filed by Mohammed E. Elhassan. (Attachments: #1 Attachment-1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Receipt) (Dest) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
