Cameron v. Ellis III et al
| Alexander Cameron |
| T.S. Ellis III, Circuit Court for the City of Alexandria, United States District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles and Patricia Tolliver-Giles |
| 1:2023cv00714 |
| June 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| William E Fitzpatrick |
| Michael S Nachmanoff |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 LETTER/MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Alexander Cameron. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(show) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Amend the Record filed by Alexander Cameron. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(show) |
Filing 4
ORDERED that this action be DISMISSED as an unauthorized successive petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254; and it is further ORDERED that petitioner's Motion for Rehearing / Rehearing En Banc [Dkt. No. 2] be DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff on 6/13/2023. (show)
|
| Filing 3 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (show) |
| Filing 2 MOTION Rehearing/Rehearing Enbanc, filed by Alexander Cameron. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(show) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Emergency Writ of Mandamus, filed by Alexander Cameron. (Attachments: #1 Prisoners Database, #2 Envelope)(show) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
