Snead v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
| King Cedric Omar Snead |
| Commonwealth of Virginia, Mercy, Mr. B., Abagial, Augustus Paul, Dr. Omen and Dr. Leiven |
| 1:2023cv00718 |
| June 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| William E Fitzpatrick |
| Michael S Nachmanoff |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Virginia Western; Case Number 7:23-cv-00315. Original file and docket sheet received. (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/2/2023: #2 Prisoner Data Report) (ldab, ). |
| Notification of transfer of 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights case from the Western District of VA Case No. 7:23cv315 to the Eastern District of Virginia. (ldab, ) |
Filing 3
Order transferring case to Eastern District of Virginia. Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones on 5/31/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 6/2/2023.]
|
| Filing 2 Statement of Assets by Cedric Omar Snead (aab) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 6/2/2023.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Abagial, Commonwealth of Virginia, Leiven, Mercy, Mr. B., Omen, Augustus Paul, filed by Cedric Omar Snead.(aab) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 6/2/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
