Page v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
| Kimberly Page |
| Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv00877 |
| July 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Patricia Tolliver Giles |
| Lindsey R Vaala |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall answer or otherwiserespond to the Complaint (ECF No. 1) on or before September 6, 2023. No further extensionswill be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lindsey R. Vaala on 08/22/2023. (dvanm, )
|
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Berg, Alexander) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed Steven Silver for Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. Signed by District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles on 8/7/2023. (swil)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed Danielle Herring for Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. Signed by District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles on 8/7/2023. (swil)
|
| Filing 6 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Steven Silver and Certification of Local Counsel Alexander P. Berg Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-9053352. by Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.. (Berg, Alexander) |
| Filing 5 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Danielle Herring and Certification of Local Counsel Alexander P. Berg Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-9053276. by Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.. (Berg, Alexander) |
|
Filing 4
ORDERED that #2 the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (ECF No. 1) on or before August 23, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lindsey R. Vaala on 07/27/2023. (dvanm)
|
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.. (Berg, Alexander) |
| Filing 2 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Berg, Alexander) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles and Magistrate Judge Lindsey R. Vaala. (dvanm) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9012525.), filed by Kimberly Page. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Miller, Damon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Page v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kimberly Page | |
| Represented By: | Damon Robert Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Alexander Paul Berg |
| Represented By: | Danielle Herring |
| Represented By: | Steven Silver |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
