Brown v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC
| Steven Brown |
| Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC |
| 1:2023cv00986 |
| July 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Anthony J Trenga |
| Lindsey R Vaala |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
So Ordered in re #7 MOTION to Voluntarily Dismiss without Prejudice filed by Steven Brown. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 8/24/2023. (swil)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Voluntarily Dismiss without Prejudice by Steven Brown. (Mundaca, Francisco) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steven Brown Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC served on 8/3/2023, answer due 8/24/2023 (Mundaca, Francisco) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed Ivey Best for Steven Brown. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 8/2/2023. (swil)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Steven Brown re #2 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Ivey E. Best and Certification of Local Counsel Francisco E. Mundaca Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-9046620. (Corrective filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order)(Mundaca, Francisco) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC, NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Summons Notice)(swil) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Anthony J Trenga and Magistrate Judge Lindsey R. Vaala. (swil) |
| Filing 2 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Ivey E. Best and Certification of Local Counsel Francisco E. Mundaca Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-9046620. by Steven Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Declaration, #2 Proposed Order Application/Proposed Order)(Mundaca, Francisco) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9046616.), filed by Steven Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit proposed Summons)(Mundaca, Francisco) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven Brown | |
| Represented By: | Francisco Egbert Mundaca |
| Represented By: | Ivey Best |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
