Galloway v. Clarke et al
| Sean C. Galloway |
| Harold Clarke, Cabell and Darden |
| 1:2023cv00991 |
| July 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Rossie D Alston |
| William E Fitzpatrick |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Bivens Prisoner |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDERED that the complaint be and is conditionally filed pending compliance with the requirements of this Order; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is assessed a filing fee of $350.00 and an administrative fee of $52.00, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1914(a); and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [Dkt. No 2] is DENIED without prejudice; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff particularize and amend his complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order using the enclosed standardized 1983 complaint form (see Order for further details). Signed by District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr on 8/23/2023. (Dest)
|
| Filing 3 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (Dest) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel, filed by Sean C. Galloway. (Dest) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Cabell, Harold Clarke, Darden, filed by Sean C. Galloway. (Attachments: #1 Prisoners Database, #2 Envelope) (Dest) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
