Driggs et. al. v. Central Intelligence Agency
| Michael Driggs, Robert Moore, Jana Orear, Christianne OMalley, Thomas Michael Logan, David Logan, Megan Marx, Terri Mumley, John Zimmerlee, Carol Hrdlicka, George Patterson, Mark Sauter and Christianne O'Malley |
| POW Investigative Project, Inc. and Central Intelligence Agency |
| 1:2023cv01124 |
| August 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John F Anderson |
| T S Ellis |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Central Intelligence Agency.(Barghaan, Dennis) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Central Intelligence Agency, NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney)(nneb) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons by Michael Driggs, Carol Hrdlicka, David Logan, Thomas Michael Logan, Megan Marx, Robert Moore, Terri Mumley, Christianne O'Malley, Jana Orear, POW Investigative Project, Inc., George Patterson, Mark Sauter, John Zimmerlee. (Clarke, John) |
| Filing 5 FILED IN ERROR AND REMOVED (nneb, ). |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Michael Driggs, Carol Hrdlicka, David Logan, Thomas Michael Logan, Megan Marx, Robert Moore, Terri Mumley, Christianne O'Malley, Jana Orear, POW Investigative Project, Inc., George Patterson, Mark Sauter, John Zimmerlee. (Clarke, John) |
| Notice of Correction: The filing user has been notified that a Proposed Summons was not submitted as to defendant - Central Intelligence Agency. (wgar, ) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed as to USA or Summons Returned Unexecuted as to USA. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney)(wgar, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge T. S. Ellis, III and Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (wgar, ) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Michael Driggs, Carol Hrdlicka, David Logan, Thomas Michael Logan, Megan Marx, Robert Moore, Terri Mumley, Christianne OMalley, Jana Orear, George Patterson, Mark Sauter, John Zimmerlee. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(Clarke, John) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9093316.), filed by David Logan, Jana Orear, Megan Marx, John Zimmerlee, Mark Sauter, Robert Moore, Terri Mumley, Michael Driggs, Christianne OMalley, Carol Hrdlicka, Thomas Michael Logan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit FOIA Request, #2 Affidavit Smith, #3 Affidavit Shipp, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Clarke, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
