Senteno v. Jung et al
| Alfonso Senteno |
| May Jung and BKMJ, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv01271 |
| September 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John F Anderson |
| T S Ellis |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 Labor Litigation |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to BKMJ, Inc. (wgar, ) |
| Set Deadline as to #9 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendant BKMJ Inc. Motion Hearing set for 12/1/2023 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 501 before Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (wgar, ) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Khadeja Binte Tipu on behalf of Alfonso Senteno (Tipu, Khadeja) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Hearing Date re #9 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendant BKMJ Inc. (Sutter, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendant BKMJ Inc. by Alfonso Senteno. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Affidavit)(Sutter, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 Request for Entry of Default as to Defendant BKMJ Inc. by Alfonso Senteno. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Sutter, Matthew) |
Filing 7
ORDERED that Plaintiff immediately SEEK an entry of default against BKMJ Inc. from the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Rule 55(a), Fed. R. Civ. P. It is further ORDERED that this matter is REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 AND Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., for all further default proceedings and for preparation of a prompt report and recommendation. Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 10/23/2023. (tran)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDERED that this case is STAYED by operation of 11 U.S.C. 362 as against Defendant May Jung. It is further ORDERED that Defendant BKMJ Inc. is WARNED that it has a duty to file timely a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's complaint. If BKMJ Inc. does not respond to the complaint or seek additional time to do so, BKMJ will be found in default. BKMJ, a coporate entity, "must be represented by an attorney in federal court" and cannot proceed pro se. In re Tamojira Inc. 20 F. App'x 133, 134 (4th Cir. 2001). Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 10/16/2023. (tran)
|
| Filing 5 SUGGESTION OF BANKRUPTCY Upon the Record by May Jung. (Victory, James) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on BKMJ Inc. and May Jung on 09/25/2023, filed by Alfonso Senteno. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Sutter, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to BKMJ, Inc., May Jung, NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney)(nneb) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge T. S. Ellis, III and Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (nneb) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Alfonso Senteno. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(Sutter, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9135202.), filed by Alfonso Senteno. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sutter, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
