Rahbar et al v. Rosengart et al
| Raymond Rahbar, Jr., Carl Heinz Pierre, Raymond Rahbar and Carl Pierre |
| Michael Rosengart, Prehab Exercises, LLC, David Scher, Charlie's House, LLC, Authentic Yoga Studios, LLC and Hoyer Law Firm, PLLC |
| 1:2023cv01327 |
| September 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John F Anderson |
| Michael S Nachmanoff |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Computer Crimes Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Opposition to #5 Request for Entry of Default as to filed by Prehab Exercises, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Sheriff's Return Stating No Service Accomplished)(Scher, David) |
| Filing 13 Opposition to #6 Request for Entry of Default as to, #7 MOTION Judicial Notice of Service filed by David Scher. (Scher, David) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Other Reasons with Roseboro,. by Michael Rosengart. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Proposed Order)(Fulleborn, David) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Michael Rosengart Notice of Related Cases (Fulleborn, David) |
Filing 10
ORDERED that a status conference will be held before the undersigned on Friday, December 8, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. to discuss the requests for entry of default (Docket nos. 5, 6), the status of service on all defendants, and the claims asserted against defendant Rosengart individually. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 10/26/2023. (dvanm)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Pro Se E-Noticing. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 10/26/2023. (dvanm, )
|
| Set Hearings: Status Conference set for 12/8/2023 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 501 before Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (dvanm) |
| Filing 8 Waiver of Oral Argument re #7 Plaintiffs Raymond Rahbars MOTION for Judicial Notice of Service or Waive of Service Upon David Scher by Raymond Rahbar (dvanm) |
| Filing 7 Plaintiffs Raymond Rahbars MOTION for Judicial Notice of Service or Waive of Service Upon David Scher by Raymond Rahbar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order)(dvanm) |
| Filing 6 Request for Entry of Default as to David Scher by Carl Pierre, Raymond Rahbar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(dvanm) |
| Filing 5 Request for Entry of Default as to Prehab Exercise, LLC by Carl Pierre, Raymond Rahbar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(dvanm) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Se E-Noticing by Raymond Rahbar. (swil) |
|
Filing 3
ORDERED that the motion re #2 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant Michael Rosengart to file a responsive pleading be extended thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff on 10/5/2023. (lcre, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Stay Deadline to file Answer or Other Responsive Pleadings by Michael Rosengart. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fulleborn, David) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff and Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (Dest) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal based on Federal Question and Diversity Jurisdiction ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9148505.), filed by Michael Rosengart. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3)(Fulleborn, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
