Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. National Archives and Records Administration et al
| Americans for Prosperity Foundation |
| National Archives and Records Administration and U.S. Department Of Justice |
| 1:2023cv01433 |
| October 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Claude M Hilton |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDERED that, on or before January 11, 2024, the parties will file a joint status report apprising the Court of the status of Plaintiff's FOIA requests that are the subject of this action, including an estimate of volume of any records yet to be processed and a negotiated schedule for rolling responses, as appropriate (See Order for Details). Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 11/27/2023. (lcre, )
|
| Filing 12 STATUS REPORT (Joint) by National Archives and Records Administration, U.S. Department Of Justice. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fuchs, Yuri) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint by National Archives and Records Administration, U.S. Department Of Justice.(Fuchs, Yuri) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Americans for Prosperity Foundation re #9 Summons Returned Executed as to USA (Mulvey, Ryan) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Americans for Prosperity Foundation. U.S. Attorney served 10/26/2023, answer due date 12/26/2023, U.S. Attorney General served on 11/2/2023, National Archives and Records Administration served on 10/25/2023, Department of Justice served on 11/2/2023. (Mulvey, Ryan) Modified on 11/8/2023 (Sbro). |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to National Archives and Records Administration, U.S. Department Of Justice, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed as to USA or Summons Returned Unexecuted as to USA. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney) (Sbro) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Claude M. Hilton and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (Sbro) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Americans for Prosperity Foundation re #6 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons (Mulvey, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons as to U.S. Attorney's Office by Americans for Prosperity Foundation. (Mulvey, Ryan) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons as to Attorney General of the United States by Americans for Prosperity Foundation. (Mulvey, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons as to U.S. Department of Justice by Americans for Prosperity Foundation. (Mulvey, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons as to National Archives & Records Administration by Americans for Prosperity Foundation. (Mulvey, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Americans for Prosperity Foundation. (Mulvey, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9179873.), filed by Americans for Prosperity Foundation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mulvey, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
