Chaudry v. Mayorkas et al
Secretary Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Kimberly Zanotti, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas |
Mohammad Ousman Chaudry |
1:2023cv01489 |
November 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Ivan D Davis |
T S Ellis |
Mandamus & Other |
8 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Fabienne Chatain and Certification of Local Counsel Joseph Peter Drennan Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-9200108. by Mohammad Ousman Chaudry. (Drennan, Joseph) |
Filing 7 Proposed Summons for U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia by Mohammad Ousman Chaudry. (Drennan, Joseph) |
Filing 6 Proposed Summons for Attorney General of the U.S. by Mohammad Ousman Chaudry. (Drennan, Joseph) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons for Kimberly Zanotti by Mohammad Ousman Chaudry. (Drennan, Joseph) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons for Ur Mendoza Jaddou by Mohammad Ousman Chaudry. (Drennan, Joseph) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons for Alejandro Mayorkas by Mohammad Ousman Chaudry. (Drennan, Joseph) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Mohammad Ousman Chaudry. (Drennan, Joseph) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus (Filing fee $ 402.), filed by Mohammad Ousman Chaudry. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit #1, #2 Exhibit #2, #3 Exhibit #3, #4 Exhibit #4, #5 Exhibit #5, #6 Exhibit #6)(Drennan, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.