David Mendez Argueta v. Doe et al
David The Estate of Mendez-Hernandez and David Mendez Argueta |
John Doe, United States Postal Service United States Postal Service doing business as USPS and United States Postal Service |
1:2023cv01521 |
November 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
T S Ellis |
William E Fitzpatrick |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim - Personal Injury/Motor Vehicle |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United States Postal Service, NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(jlan) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons by David Mendez Argueta. (Risheq, Waleed) |
No service issued at this time. (Sbro) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge T. S. Ellis, III and Magistrate Judge William E. Fitzpatrick. (Sbro) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9211861.), filed by David The Estate of Mendez-Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Risheq, Waleed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.