Sedia v. Navy Federal Credit Union, et al.
| Joseph Sedia |
| Navy Federal Credit Union and TransUnion, LLC |
| 1:2023cv01539 |
| November 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Leonie M Brinkema |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
So Ordered in re #4 Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice filed by Joseph Sedia. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 1/3/2024. (swil)
|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION of Dismissal Navy FCU by Joseph Sedia. (Shuniak, J) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Navy Federal Credit Union.(Briones, Elizabeth) |
| Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson no longer assigned to the case. (jlan) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema and Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (Dest) |
| Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Navy Federal Credit Union. (Briones, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9217597.), filed by Navy Federal Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B- Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Briones, Elizabeth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
