Purisima v. Babcock et al
| Anton C. Purisima, Four Son's of Anton C. Purisima, United States of America and Republic of The Philippines |
| Morgan Babcock, City of New York, New York State, United States Postal Services, U.S. Senate Members, U.S. Congress Members, Nancy Pelosi, People's Republic of China, Doe's 1-3 Billion, City of Los Angeles, State of California and New York City College of Technology |
| 1:2023cv01543 |
| November 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Michael S Nachmanoff |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Letter/Motion filed by Anton C. Purisima. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Envelope) (Sbro) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Anton C. Purisima. (Sbro) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Morgan Babcock, City of Los Angeles, City of New York, Doe's 1-3 Billion, New York City College of Technology, New York State, Nancy Pelosi, People's Republic of China, State of California, U.S. Congress Members, U.S. Senate Members, United States Postal Services, filed by Anton C. Purisima. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit AAA, #6 Envelope)(Sbro) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
