PACEM Solutions International, LLC v. U.S. Small Business Administration, et al.
| PACEM Solutions International LLC and PACEM Solutions International, LLC |
| U.S. Small Business Administration, Isabella Casillas Guzman, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Small Business Administration and Isabella Casillas Guzman |
| 1:2023cv01702 |
| December 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Leonie M Brinkema |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Isabella Casillas Guzman, U.S. Small Business Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed as to USA or Summons Returned Unexecuted as to USA. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney) (Dest) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint, by PACEM Solutions International, LLC. (Johns, Milton) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint, by PACEM Solutions International, LLC. (Johns, Milton) |
| Notice of Correction re #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons. Unfortunately, the documents were incorrectly saved PDF fillable form which we have removed. Please refile the document after saving it correctly. To correctly save the PDF fillable form, click on the File menu select Print, and then select your PDF writer from the Printer Name List, then click on Print or OK depending on your program. Additionally, please refers to Rule 4 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for service of process on a U.S. Government Agency or Employee. (Dest) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint, by PACEM Solutions International, LLC. (Johns, Milton) (Main Document 5 replaced on 1/4/2024. This document has been removed, filed in PDF fillable form) (Dest). |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint, by PACEM Solutions International, LLC. (Johns, Milton) (Main Document 4 replaced on 1/4/2024. This document has been removed, filed in PDF fillable form) (Dest). |
| Notice of Correction re #3 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons. Unfortunately the Clerk's office is unable to issue the Proposed Summons as this time. Attorney must file Proposed Summons in PDF Format for U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Please refers to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Dest) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint, by PACEM Solutions International, LLC. (Johns, Milton) (Main Document 3 replaced to correct PDF fillable form on 12/22/2023) (Dest). |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint, by PACEM Solutions International, LLC. (Johns, Milton) (Main Document 2 replaced to correct PDF fillable form on 12/22/2023) (Dest). |
| No service issued at this time. (Dest) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (Dest) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-9264220.), filed by PACEM Solutions International LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Johns, Milton) (Attachment 1 replaced to correct pdf fillable form on 12/15/2023) (Dest). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
