Heery v. Digital Realty, LP et al
| Christine Heery |
| Digital Realty, LP and DLR, LLC |
| 1:2023cv01746 |
| December 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Michael S Nachmanoff |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Christine Heery. (Teachout, Valerie) |
| Case Reassigned to District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff. District Judge Claude M. Hilton no longer assigned to the case. (wgar, ) |
| Set Deadline as to #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Motion Hearing set for 3/15/2024 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 800 before District Judge Claude M. Hilton. (wgar, ) |
| Filing 14 Notice of Hearing Date re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Siegner, Scott) |
| Filing 13 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by DLR, LLC. (Siegner, Scott) |
| Filing 12 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Digital Realty, LP. (Siegner, Scott) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by William Ryan Waddell on behalf of DLR, LLC, Digital Realty, LP (Waddell, William) |
| Notice of Correction re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The filing user has been notified to file a Notice of Hearing or a Notice of Waiver of Oral Argument. (swil) |
| Filing 10 Memorandum in Support re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by DLR, LLC, Digital Realty, LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Siegner, Scott) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by DLR, LLC, Digital Realty, LP. (Siegner, Scott) |
Filing 8
ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Defendants shall file their response to the Complaint no later than January 31, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis on 1/11/2024. (Dcrow, )
|
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by DLR, LLC, Digital Realty, LP. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Siegner, Scott) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christine Heery DLR, LLC served on 12/27/2023, answer due 1/17/2024 (Teachout, Valerie) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christine Heery Digital Realty, LP served on 12/27/2023, answer due 1/17/2024 (Teachout, Valerie) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to DLR, LLC, Digital Realty, LP, NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Summons Notice)(swil) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Claude M. Hilton and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (swil) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint DLR, LLC by Christine Heery. (Teachout, Valerie) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint Digital Realty, LP by Christine Heery. (Teachout, Valerie) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-9275016.), filed by Christine Heery. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Teachout, Valerie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
