Goble v. Lexisnexis Special Services, Inc.
Julie Goble |
Lexisnexis Special Services, Inc. |
1:2023cv01774 |
December 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Rossie D Alston |
Lindsey R Vaala |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Employment Discrimination (Sex) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed Caroline Michelle Whitlock for Julie Goble. Signed by District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr on 1/26/2024. (swil) |
Filing 10 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Caroline Whitlock and Certification of Local Counsel Ellen Renaud Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-9314634. by Julie Goble. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Renaud, Ellen) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Lexisnexis Special Services, Inc..(Kiely, Christy) |
Filing 8 ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant to file its responsive pleading is extended to January 16, 2024 in re #4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal (Answer Deadline). Signed by Magistrate Judge Lindsey R. Vaala on 1/2/2024. (swil) |
Filing 7 Civil Cover Sheet re #1 Notice of Removal by Lexisnexis Special Services, Inc.. (Kiely, Christy) |
Notice of Correction re #1 Notice of Removal. Unfortunately, the Notice of Removal was filed without a Civil Cover Sheet. The filing user has been notified to file a Civil Cover Sheet. (Dest) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr and Magistrate Judge Lindsey R. Vaala. (Dest) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Ellen Kyriacou Renaud on behalf of Julie Goble (Renaud, Ellen) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ellen Kyriacou Renaud on behalf of Julie Goble (Renaud, Ellen) |
Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal (Answer Deadline) by Lexisnexis Special Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Consent Order Signed by Parties)(Kiely, Christy) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lexisnexis Special Services, Inc.. (Kiely, Christy) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Christy Ellen Wetzel Kiely on behalf of Lexisnexis Special Services, Inc. (Kiely, Christy) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-9282272.), filed by Lexisnexis Special Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Notice of Notice of Removal)(Kiely, Christy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Goble v. Lexisnexis Special Services, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Julie Goble | |
Represented By: | Ellen Kyriacou Renaud |
Represented By: | Caroline Michelle Whitlock |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Lexisnexis Special Services, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Christy Ellen Wetzel Kiely |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.