Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC |
John Doe |
1:2023cv01786 |
December 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
David J Novak |
Lindsey R Vaala |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER (Granting Leave to Serve Subpoena): For good cause shown, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion #6 and DIRECTS that a subpoena be issued to Verizon Fios requiring that Internet Service Provider ("ISP") to provide Plaintiff the true name and address of the Defendant. Plaintiff may also serve a Rule 45 subpoena on any service provider that is identified in response to subpoena as a provider of Internet services to the Defendant pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 551(c)(2)(B) and 522 (5). Plaintiff shall attach to any such subpoena a copy of this Order. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 2/12/2024. (tran) |
Filing 8 Waiver of Oral Arguments by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (Sciarrino, Dawn) |
Filing 7 Memorandum filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Williamson, #2 Exhibit B- Paige, #3 Exhibit C- Staltzer)(Sciarrino, Dawn) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Discovery by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sciarrino, Dawn) |
Filing 5 ORDERED that all civil actions currently assigned to the Honorable T.S. Ellis, III, other than 42 U.S.C. 1983 prisoner rights cases and habeas cases filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254, 28 U.S.C. 2241, and 28 U.S.C. 2255, be transferred to the Honorable David J. Novak, effective as of the date of this Order. Signed by Chief District Judge Mark S. Davis on 1/18/24. (tfitz, ) |
Filing 4 Docketed in Error and Removed (wgar, ). (Main Document 4 replaced on 1/18/2024) (wgar, ). |
Case reassigned to District Judge David J. Novak. District Judge T. S. Ellis, III no longer assigned to the case. (tfitz, ) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge T. S. Ellis, III and Magistrate Judge Lindsey R. Vaala. (jlan) |
Filing 3 Report on the filing or determination of an action filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- a single transaction of each work infringed)(Sciarrino, Dawn) Modified text on 1/2/2024 (jlan) ). |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Sciarrino, Dawn) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-9285447.), filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- a single transaction of each work infringed, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sciarrino, Dawn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC | |
Represented By: | Dawn Marie Sciarrino |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: John Doe | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.