Suthrave et al v. Garland et al
Plaintiff: Ramesh Suthrave and Sandhya Rani Suthrave
Defendant: Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur M. Jaddou
Case Number: 1:2024cv00018
Filed: January 4, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: William E Fitzpatrick
Referring Judge: Michael S Nachmanoff
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDERED that the motion (Dkt. 6) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff on 2/2/2024. (Sbro)
February 1, 2024 Filing 7 Waiver of Hearing re #6 MOTION to Voluntarily Dismiss by Ramesh Suthrave, Sandhya Rani Suthrave (Sbro)
February 1, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice filed by Ramesh Suthrave, Sandhya Rani Suthrave. (Sbro)
January 17, 2024 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ramesh Suthrave, Sandhya Rani Suthrave. US Attorney served 1/5/2024, answer due 3/5/2024, Merrick B. Garland served on 1/5/2024, Ur M. Jaddou served on 1/5/2024, Alejandro Mayorkas served on 1/5/2024. (Sbro)
January 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Pro Se E-Noticing. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Fitzpatrick on 1/9/2024. (Sbro)
January 4, 2024 Filing 3 Summons Issued to be served by Certified Mail as to Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Sbro)
January 4, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Pro Se E-Noticing filed by Ramesh Suthrave. (Sbro)
January 4, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number 100005268.), filed by Ramesh Suthrave, Sandhya Rani Suthrave. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)(Sbro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Suthrave et al v. Garland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ramesh Suthrave
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sandhya Rani Suthrave
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick B. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur M. Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?