Espinosa v. Ford Motor Company
Nicole Espinosa |
FORD MOTOR COMPANY |
1:2024cv00052 |
January 10, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Patricia Tolliver Giles |
Lindsey R Vaala |
Contract: Other |
15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 4/3/2024 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 501 before Magistrate Judge Lindsey R. Vaala. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/17/2024 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Telephonically before District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles. Discovery due by 7/12/2024. Signed by District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles on 02/29/24. (Attachments: #1 Pretrial Notice, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form)(pmil, ) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Ford Motor Company.(Johnson, Brian) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Vincent Johnson on behalf of Ford Motor Company (Johnson, Brian) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nicole Espinosa Ford Motor Company served on 2/7/2024, answer due 2/28/2024 (Feinman, James) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Ford Motor Company, NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney) (Dest) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Nicole Espinosa. (Feinman, James) |
Notice of Correction re #2 Certificate of Service. Unfortunately, the document was filed using the wrong docket event. The "Proposed Summons" event was incorrectly filed as "Certificate." Additionally, the Proposed Summons contains more than one service address. The filing user has been notified to refile the Proposed Summons using the correct event, and one service address. (Dest) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Nicole Espinosa re #1 Complaint (Feinman, James) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles and Magistrate Judge Lindsey R. Vaala. (Dest) |
No service issued at this time. (Dest) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-9303871.), filed by Nicole Espinosa. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Feinman, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Espinosa v. Ford Motor Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Nicole Espinosa | |
Represented By: | James Ben Feinman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: FORD MOTOR COMPANY | |
Represented By: | Brian Vincent Johnson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.