Bradley v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
| DONNIE BRADLEY |
| Life Insurance Company of North America and Navy Federal Credit Union |
| 1:2024cv00106 |
| January 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| William E Fitzpatrick |
| Patricia Tolliver Giles |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Donnie Bradley. Navy Federal Credit Union waiver sent on 1/24/2024, answer due 3/25/2024. (Miller, Damon) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Life Insurance Company of North America.(Constine, David) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Life Insurance Company of North America of Filing Supplemental Exhibit C to Notice of Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit C)(Constine, David) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles and Magistrate Judge William E. Fitzpatrick. (Cwel) |
| Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Life Insurance Company of North America. (Constine, David) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-9321611.), filed by Life Insurance Company of North America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Constine, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
