Kamil v. United States Department of State et al
| Mohamed Omer Abuhafs Kamil |
| United States Department of State, U.S. Embassy in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Antony J. Blinken and Michael Ratney |
| 1:2024cv00462 |
| March 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by James O. Hacking III and Certification of Local Counsel Roya Vasseghi Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-9430574. by Mohamed Omer Abuhafs Kamil. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Vasseghi, Roya) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons by Mohamed Omer Abuhafs Kamil. (Vasseghi, Roya) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons by Mohamed Omer Abuhafs Kamil. (Vasseghi, Roya) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons by Mohamed Omer Abuhafs Kamil. (Vasseghi, Roya) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons by Mohamed Omer Abuhafs Kamil. (Vasseghi, Roya) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons by Mohamed Omer Abuhafs Kamil. (Vasseghi, Roya) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Mohamed Omer Abuhafs Kamil. (Vasseghi, Roya) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-9430458.), filed by Mohamed Omer Abuhafs Kamil. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vasseghi, Roya) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
