Zahed et al v. MAYORKAS et al
| Amir Zahed and Regwida Neayish |
| Secretary of DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. Jaddou, Acting Associate Dir Ted H. Kim and Attorney General US Merrick B. Garland |
| 1:2024cv00681 |
| April 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Tamunotonte Battle-Ax Fenny and Certification of Local Counsel Charles J. Homiller, Jr. Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-9493527. by Regwida Neayish, Amir Zahed. (Homiller, Charles) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons to US Attorney by Regwida Neayish, Amir Zahed. (Homiller, Charles) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons to Alejandro Mayorkas by Regwida Neayish, Amir Zahed. (Homiller, Charles) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons to Ted H. Kim by Regwida Neayish, Amir Zahed. (Homiller, Charles) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons to UR M. Jaddou by Regwida Neayish, Amir Zahed. (Homiller, Charles) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons to Merrick Garland by Regwida Neayish, Amir Zahed. (Homiller, Charles) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number BVAEDC-9493447.), filed by Amir Zahed, Regwida Neayish. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Homiller, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
