Chaudhary v. Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
| Vikas Chaudhary |
| Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 1:2024cv01160 |
| July 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Rossie D Alston |
| William B Porter |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice in re #5 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Vikas Chaudhary. Signed by District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr on 8/28/2024. (swil)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Vikas Chaudhary (Jezic, Tamara) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Vikas Chaudhary. Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 7/15/2024, answer due 9/13/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Certified Mail Receipt)(Jezic, Tamara) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed as to USA or Summons Returned Unexecuted as to USA. (Attachments: #1 Summons Notice)(swil) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Vikas Chaudhary. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Summons - USAO, #2 Supplement Summons - USCIS)(Jezic, Tamara) |
| Notice of Correction re #1 Complaint. Unfortunately, document number (1) contains documents as attachments (2,3 and 4) that should have been filed separately. (As a reminder, we request that filing users file the Proposed Summons Separately). Please refile the documents again. (Cwel) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr and US Magistrate Judge William B. Porter. (Cwel) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-9615864.), filed by Vikas Chaudhary. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Jezic, Tamara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chaudhary v. Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Vikas Chaudhary | |
| Represented By: | Tamara Lee Jezic |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
