Al Amad v. Nebreda et al
| Diaa Al Amad |
| Julian Nebreda, Ahmed Pasha, Cynthia Arnold, Herman Bulls, Emma Falck, Ricardo Falu, Elizabeth Fessenden, Harald Von Heynitz, Barbara Humpton, Axel Meier, Tish Mendoza, Chris Shelton, Simon James Smith and Fluence Energy, Inc. |
| 1:2025cv00577 |
| April 3, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Patricia Tolliver Giles |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER consolidating cases 1:25cv521 and 1:25cv577 for all purposes, including pre-trial proceedings and trial, into a single consolidated action under Lead Case No. 1:25-cv-00521. Signed by District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles on 04/22/2025. (see order for details)(dvanm)
|
| Filing 2 STIPULATION to Consolidate Cases and Appoint Co-Lead Counsel by Diaa Al Amad. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - The Brown Law Firm Bio, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Rigrodsky Law Bio)(Browne, David) |
| Summons not requested at this time. (dvanm) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (dvanm) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-10102140.), filed by Diaa Al Amad. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit Verification of Plaintiff)(Browne, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
