Gia et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
| Thi Mai Hien Gia, Huy Thang Vu, Huy Thong Vu, G.H.V., Hoa Thi Thanh Nguyen, H.K.N.N., H.K.A.N., N.K.N., Svetlana Krylova, Evgeny Krylov, Mark Krylov, Marta Krylova, Peter Pietrzkiewicz, Lucas Vianna de Andrade Barreto, C.P.V., Zbigniew Pietrzkiewicz, Krystyna Pietrzkiewicz, Uma Saimani, Dileep Ranga Rao Vollala, Koushik Gupta, Vishika Gupta, Z.G., Minh Hang Vu, Dat Duy Nguyen, L.A.T., Ha Thanh Tran, Thi Dep Nguyen, Gita Nadimpalli, Hao Thien Hua, Minh Hoang Tran, M.B.C.T., L.P.A.T., Le Anh Tran, Saikrishna Nadimpalli, Quoc Anh Hua, T.P.H., Shivam Nadimpalli, Pattabhiramarao Nadimpalli, Thi Le Phuong Le, T.D.H. and T.H.H. |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 1:2025cv00913 |
| May 28, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Leonie M Brinkema |
| William B Porter |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STATUS REPORT (Joint) by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Cooper, Christian) |
Filing 9
ORDERED that the parties motion is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the instant action is STAYED until further order of this Court; and it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall file a status report with this Court on October 27, 2025, which is ninety (90) days after Defendant's answer deadline; and every sixty (60) days thereafter re #8 Motion to Stay. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 7/25/2025. (Sbro, )
|
| Filing 8 Joint MOTION to Stay the Proceedings by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cooper, Christian) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Christian James Cooper on behalf of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Cooper, Christian) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dileep Ranga Rao Vollala, T.P.H., Ha Thanh Tran, Dat Duy Nguyen, M.B.C.T., L.A.T., Huy Thang Vu, C.P.V., Thi Mai Hien Gia, Zbigniew Pietrzkiewicz, Quoc Anh Hua, Thi Dep Nguyen, Lucas Vianna de Andrade Barreto, T.H.H., L.P.A.T., Le Anh Tran, Gita Nadimpalli, Uma Saimani, Marta Krylova, Shivam Nadimpalli, Z.G., N.K.N., Svetlana Krylova, Minh Hoang Tran, Koushik Gupta, Vishika Gupta, Mark Krylov, Thi Le Phuong Le, Hoa Thi Thanh Nguyen, Minh Hang Vu, Pattabhiramarao Nadimpalli, H.K.A.N., Evgeny Krylov, Peter Pietrzkiewicz, H.K.N.N., Huy Thong Vu, T.D.H., Hao Thien Hua, Saikrishna Nadimpalli, Krystyna Pietrzkiewicz, G.H.V.. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 5/30/2025, U.S. Attorney General served on 5/30/2025, U.S. Attorney served on 5/30/2025, answer due 7/29/2025 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D)(Galati, Matthew) Modified to correct docket text on 6/24/2025 (Sbro, ). |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, filed by Dileep Ranga Rao Vollala, Duy Nguyen Dat, Huy Thang Vu, C.P.V., Thi Mai Hien Gia, Zbigniew Pietrzkiewicz, Lucas Vianna de Andrade Barreto, Uma Saimani, Marta Krylova, Z.G., N.K.N., Svetlana Krylova, Koushik Gupta, Vishika Gupta, Mark Krylov, Hoa Thi Thanh Nguyen, Minh Hang Vu, H.K.A.N., Evgeny Krylov, Peter Pietrzkiewicz, H.K.N.N., Huy Thong Vu, Krystyna Pietrzkiewicz, G.H.V., L.A.T., Ha Thanh Tran, Thi Dep Nguyen, Gita Nadimpalli, Hao Thien Hua, Minh Hoang Tran, M.B.C.T., L.P.A.T., Le Anh Tran, Saikrishna Nadimpalli, Quoc Anh Hua, T.P.H., Shivam Nadimpalli, Pattabhiramarao Nadimpalli, Thi Le Phuong Le, T.D.H., T.H.H.. (Attachments: #1 First Amended Complaint with Redlines, #2 Exhibit Index, #3 Exhibit Index with Redlines, #4 Exhibit A - Service Packet Delivery Confirmation, #5 Exhibit B - Historic National Median Processing Times, last accessed June 5, 2025, #6 Exhibit C - USCIS I-829 Processing Time, last accessed June 5, 2025, #7 Exhibit D - IIUSA, I-829 Processing Time Dashboard, #8 Exhibit E - I-829 Processing Time on October 21, 2022, #9 Exhibit F - I-829 Processing Time on November 30, 2022, #10 Exhibit G - I-829 Processing Time on March 15, 2023, #11 Exhibit H - I-829 Processing Time on January 12, 2024, #12 Exhibit I - Da Costa Transcript, #13 Exhibit J - AIIA Adjudication Statistics, #14 Exhibit K - USCIS Extending Validity of Green Cards, #15 Exhibit L - USCIS Email, #16 Exhibit M - USCIS Announcement, #17 Exhibit N - Request for Evidence)(Galati, Matthew) |
| Notice of Correction re #4 NOTICE. The filing user has been notified to file an amended complaint. (swil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by C.P.V., Duy Nguyen Dat, G.H.V., Thi Mai Hien Gia, Koushik Gupta, Vishika Gupta, H.K.A.N., H.K.N.N., Evgeny Krylov, Mark Krylov, Marta Krylova, Svetlana Krylova, N.K.N., Hoa Thi Thanh Nguyen, Krystyna Pietrzkiewicz, Peter Pietrzkiewicz, Zbigniew Pietrzkiewicz, Uma Saimani, Lucas Vianna de Andrade Barreto, Dileep Ranga Rao Vollala, Huy Thang Vu, Huy Thong Vu, Minh Hanh Vu, Z.G. re #1 Complaint,,,, Notice of Errata (Galati, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed as to USA or Summons Returned Unexecuted as to USA. (Attachments: #1 Summons Notice)(swil) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema and US Magistrate Judge William B. Porter. (swil) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint,,,, by C.P.V., Duy Nguyen Dat, G.H.V., Thi Mai Hien Gia, Koushik Gupta, Vishika Gupta, H.K.A.N., H.K.N.N., Evgeny Krylov, Mark Krylov, Marta Krylova, Svetlana Krylova, N.K.N., Hoa Thi Thanh Nguyen, Krystyna Pietrzkiewicz, Peter Pietrzkiewicz, Zbigniew Pietrzkiewicz, Uma Saimani, Lucas Vianna de Andrade Barreto, Dileep Ranga Rao Vollala, Huy Thang Vu, Huy Thong Vu, Minh Hanh Vu, Z.G. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons to United States Attorney General, #2 Proposed Summons to the United States Attorney's Office)(Galati, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-10204811.), filed by Svetlana Krylova, Dileep Ranga Rao Vollala, Duy Nguyen Dat, Huy Thang Vu, C.P.V., Koushik Gupta, Thi Mai Hien Gia, Zbigniew Pietrzkiewicz, Lucas Vianna de Andrade Barreto, Mark Krylov, Vishika Gupta, Hoa Thi Thanh Nguyen, Minh Hanh Vu, H.K.A.N., Evgeny Krylov, Uma Saimani, Marta Krylova, Peter Pietrzkiewicz, H.K.N.N., Huy Thong Vu, Z.G., N.K.N., Krystyna Pietrzkiewicz, G.H.V.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Index, #3 Exhibit A - Historic National Median Processing Times, #4 Exhibit B - USCIS I-829 Processing Time, #5 Exhibit C - IIUSA, I-829 Processing Time Dashboard, #6 Exhibit D - I-829 Processing Time on October 21, 2022, #7 Exhibit E - I-829 Processing Time on November 30, 2022, #8 Exhibit F - I-829 Processing Time on March 15, 2023, #9 Exhibit G - I-829 Processing Time on January 12, 2024, #10 Exhibit H - Da Costa Transcript, #11 Exhibit I - AIIA Adjudication Statistics, #12 Exhibit J - USCIS Extending Validity of Green Cards, #13 Exhibit K - USCIS Email, #14 Exhibit L - USCIS Announcement, #15 Exhibit M - Request for Evidence)(Galati, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.