Brown v. Alex et al
| Lewis Ross Brown |
| Alex and Riverview Shell |
| 1:2025cv01034 |
| June 18, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Leonie M Brinkema |
| William E Fitzpatrick |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Letter to the court. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dvanm) |
| Filing 6 Letter to the court. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dvanm) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/30/2025) (dvanm, ). |
Filing 5
ORDERED that this civil action be and is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction; and it is further ORDERED that the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [Dkt. No. 2] be and is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 06/23/2025. (dvanm)
|
| Filing 4 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (dvanm) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons by Lewis Ross Brown (dvanm) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lewis Ross Brown. (dvanm) Modified to correct filing date on 6/20/2025 (dvanm). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alex and Riverview Shell, filed by Lewis Ross Brown. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope)(dvanm) (Main Document 1 replaced on 6/20/2025) (dvanm, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
