Hairston v. Jacobs, et al.
| James Terry Hairston and Terry Hairston |
| R. Jacobs, John/Jane Doe, Jane/John Doe and Ms. Robinson |
| 1:2025cv01351 |
| August 13, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Leonie M Brinkema |
| William E Fitzpatrick |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Mail sent to James Terry Hairston Returned as Undeliverable. (triv) |
Filing 5
ORDERED that this civil action be and is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff's IFP application [Dkt. No. 2] be and is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 09/02/2025. See Order for further details. (triv)
|
| Filing 4 Mail sent to James Terry Hairston Returned as Undeliverable. (triv) |
| Filing 3 Acknowledgment of Receipt mailed to James Terry Hairston, 28582, Meherrin River Regional Jail - Alberta Facility, P.O. Box 189, Alberta, VA 23821. (triv) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by James Terry Hairston. (triv) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Jane/John Doe, John/Jane Doe, R. Jacobs, Robinson, filed by James Terry Hairston. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Data Sheet, #2 Inmate Request Form, #3 Cover Letter, #4 Envelope) (triv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
