American Piledriving Equipment, Inc. v. Geoquip, Inc.
Plaintiff: American Piledriving Equipment, Inc.
Defendant: Geoquip, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2008cv00547
Filed: November 18, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Patent Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Tommy E. Miller
Presiding Judge: Rebecca Beach Smith
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 35:271 Patent Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION construing the parties' disputed terms and phrases as outlined (see order for specifics). Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 12/11/2009. (rlam)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: American Piledriving Equipment, Inc. v. Geoquip, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: American Piledriving Equipment, Inc.
Represented By: Stephen Edward Noona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Geoquip, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?