Kittrell v. Johnson
Petitioner: James Earl Kittrell
Respondent: Gene M. Johnson
Case Number: 2:2008cv00603
Filed: December 18, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Norfolk Office
County: Buckingham
Presiding Judge: James E. Bradberry
Presiding Judge: Mark S. Davis
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 FINAL ORDER adopting re 12 Report and Recommendations. It is ORDERED that the petition be DENIED and DISMISSED on the merits and that judgment be entered in respondent's favor; appeal procedures noted. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 6/9/09. Copy mailed on 6/9/09 (lhow, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kittrell v. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Earl Kittrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gene M. Johnson
Represented By: Joshua Mikell Didlake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?