Perry v. Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services et al
Gerald E. Perry |
Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services, Circuit Court of Chesapeake, VA, Judge Taylor and Unknown Judge of the Circuit Court |
2:2009cv00130 |
March 24, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Petersburg City |
James E. Bradberry |
Mark S. Davis |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 FINAL ORDER accepting the findings and recommendations set forth in 18 Report and Recommendation; denying and dismissing the petition on the basis of petitioner's failure to exhaust his available state court remedies, and on the basis that Cla ims 1, 3, and 4 are noncognizable; directing that judgment be entered in respondent's favor; noting appeal procures; declining to issue certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 1/11/10; filed 1/12/2010. Copy mailed to petitioner, ECF to counsel, 1/12/10.(mwin, ) |
Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 6 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Gerald Everett Perry, 16 MOTION to Dismiss filed by James S. Reinhard. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Bradberry and filed on 12/8/09. ECF to counsel, copy mailed to petitioner c/o Central State Hospital.(mwin, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.