Commercial Metals Company v. Compania Espanola de Laminacion S.L.

Plaintiff: Commercial Metals Company
Defendant: Compania Espanola de Laminacion S.L.
Case Number: 2:2009cv00451
Filed: September 15, 2009
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Norfolk Office
County: Norfolk City
Presiding Judge: Henry C. Morgan
Referring Judge: F. Bradford Stillman
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 9, 2010 51 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION re 47 Order on Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr on 11/8/10 and filed 11/9/10. (lwoo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Commercial Metals Company v. Compania Espanola de Laminacion S.L.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Commercial Metals Company
Represented By: Matthew Stephen Sheldon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Compania Espanola de Laminacion S.L.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.