W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
| W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. and Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. |
| Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc. and Medtronic Vascular, Inc. |
| 2:2010cv00441 |
| September 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Norfolk Office |
| Out of State |
| Douglas E. Miller |
| Rebecca Beach Smith |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
189
OPINION AND ORDER - that the oral Rule 52(c) motions are DENIED. The Court finds in favor of Defendants and HOLDS that the accused manufacturing processes do not infringe claims 12, 16 or 19 of the '870 patent. Additionally, Medtronic's invalidity and unenforceability counterclaims are DISMISSED as moot. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 6/18/12. (jcow, )
|
|
Filing
123
OPINION AND ORDER - Gore's Motion to Dismiss Medtronic's Inequitable Conduct Counterclaim is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 2/3/12. (jcow, )
|
|
Filing
92
OPINION AND ORDER; the Court issues this Opinion and Order as the construction of the disputed claim terms in the '870 patent (see order for specifics). Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 12/13/11 and filed on 12/14/11. (jcow, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
