Pinpoint IT Services, LLC v. Atlas IT Export Corp.
Plaintiff: Pinpoint IT Services, LLC
Defendant: Atlas IT Export Corp.
Case Number: 2:2010cv00516
Filed: October 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Norfolk Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Mark S. Davis
Presiding Judge: F. Bradford Stillman
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 111 OPINION AND ORDER re 99 Report and Recommendations. GRANTED in part and DENIED in part 35 First MOTION for Attorney Fees by Pinpoint IT Services, LLC. TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT 37 First MOTION for Sanctions by Pinpoint IT Services, LLC. The C ourt, having reviewed the record, considered the objections filed by Plaintiff, reviewed the R&R for clear error, and made de novo findings with respect to the portions objected to, does hereby ADOPT AND APPROVE the findings and recommendations set f orth in the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, as supplemented and amended by this Order. For the reasons stated above, this Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and T AKES UNDER ADVISEMENT Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions. Accordingly, Defendant is ORDERED to pay Plaintiff $25,508 in attorneys' fees. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 7/25/13. Copies distributed to allcounsel of record 7/26/13. (ldab, )
April 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 94 MEMORANDUM OPINION For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Stay and Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Opposition to the Motion to Modify the Stay are DENIED, Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Pleading out of Time is GRANTED, Plaintiff's Motion Requesting a Ruling on Pinpoint's Motion for Attorneys' Fees is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Motion for Renewal of Motion for Injunctive Relief and Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief are STAYED. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 4/17/12 and filed on 4/18/12, copies distributed to all parties 4/18/12.(ldab, )
July 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MEMORANDUM OPINION that this Court DENIES Vaughn's Motion for Sanctions. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 7/28/11. (jcow, )
July 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 OPINION AND ORDER that the Court DENIES Defendant's Motion to Change Venue, GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Certify Entry of Default, GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Def ault, DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment and forCertification of Default as Final as to Counts I and III of the Complaint, and DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Brief. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 7/13/11. (jcow, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pinpoint IT Services, LLC v. Atlas IT Export Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pinpoint IT Services, LLC
Represented By: George H. Bowles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Atlas IT Export Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?