Innovative Legal Marketing, LLC v. Market Masters-Legal, A Resonance Company, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit Virginia Eastern District Innovative Legal Marketing, LLC v. Market Masters-Legal, A Resonance Company, Inc.

Innovative Legal Marketing, LLC v. Market Masters-Legal, A Resonance Company, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Innovative Legal Marketing, LLC
Defendant:	Market Masters-Legal, A Resonance Company, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2010cv00580
Filed:	November 23, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office:	Norfolk Office
County:	Virginia Beach City
Presiding Judge:	Rebecca Beach Smith
Presiding Judge:	F. Bradford Stillman
Nature of Suit:	Trademark
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1114
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 30, 2012	Filing 82 OPINION that the court, having examined Innovative's objections and Market's response, and having made de novo findings with respect thereto, SUSTAINS IN PART and OVERRULES IN PART Innovative's objections. Accordingly, as detailed in t his Opinion, Market's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED with respect to Market's copyright infringement claim on its Big Case Commercial; Market's infringement claim on its trademark, YOU DESERVE JUSTICE NOW DEMAND IT; and Market's claim of noninfringement of Innovative's trademark, BIGCASE.COM. Market's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED withrespect to Innovative's copyright infringement claim on the Email Script, and as to Innovative&# 039;s trademark infringement claims on the BIGCASE and 1-888-BIG-CASE marks. Innovative's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to its claim of a valid copyright in the Email Script and is DENIED as to all other claims. The court GRA NTS Market's motion for partial summary judgment as to its copyright infringement claim on its Big Case Commercial and DENIES Innovative's motion with respect to the same. the Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Market and against Innova tive with respect to all counts of the Amended Counterclaim and with respect to the claims concerning the BIGCASE.COM trademark asserted in Counts I, II, III, V, and VI of the Amended Complaint.Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 3/20/12. (mwin, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 30, 2012

Filing 82 OPINION that the court, having examined Innovative's objections and Market's response, and having made de novo findings with respect thereto, SUSTAINS IN PART and OVERRULES IN PART Innovative's objections. Accordingly, as detailed in t his Opinion, Market's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED with respect to Market's copyright infringement claim on its Big Case Commercial; Market's infringement claim on its trademark, YOU DESERVE JUSTICE NOW DEMAND IT; and Market's claim of noninfringement of Innovative's trademark, BIGCASE.COM. Market's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED withrespect to Innovative's copyright infringement claim on the Email Script, and as to Innovative&# 039;s trademark infringement claims on the BIGCASE and 1-888-BIG-CASE marks. Innovative's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to its claim of a valid copyright in the Email Script and is DENIED as to all other claims. The court GRA NTS Market's motion for partial summary judgment as to its copyright infringement claim on its Big Case Commercial and DENIES Innovative's motion with respect to the same. the Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Market and against Innova tive with respect to all counts of the Amended Counterclaim and with respect to the claims concerning the BIGCASE.COM trademark asserted in Counts I, II, III, V, and VI of the Amended Complaint.Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 3/20/12. (mwin, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Innovative Legal Marketing, LLC v. Market Masters-Legal, A Resonance Company, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Innovative Legal Marketing, LLC
Represented By:	Robert Lawrence Brooke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Market Masters-Legal, A Resonance Company, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?