Banner Life Insurance Company v. Jones et al
| Banner Life Insurance Company |
| Daphne Grantham, Clara L. Jones, Raymond D. Jones and Belle B. Jones |
| 2:2011cv00063 |
| February 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Norfolk Office |
| Accomack |
| Raymond A. Jackson |
| F. Bradford Stillman |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that the Court finds good cause to set aside the entry of default against Ms. Jones. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against Belle B. Jones is DENIED, and Plaintiff's Motion to Allow Interpleader, Enter Injunction, and Dismiss Banner Life as a Party is GRANTED. Accordingly, Defendants are ENJOINED from instituting or prosecuting any judicial proceeding against Banner Life in any State or United States court pertaining to Arthur C. Jones' life insurance policy #010498136. Further, Banner Life is DISMISSED from this matter with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order be and is hereby conditioned upon Banner Life's depositing a certified check or cash in the amount of $100,000.00, representing the full value of Arthur C. Jones' life insurance policy #010498136, with this Court's registry no later than October 10,2011.. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 9/29/11. (jcow, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
