Evans v. Larchmont Infant Care Center et al
| Nicole D. Evans |
| Larchmont Infant Care Center, Kim Carmi and Laura Reed |
| 2:2011cv00306 |
| June 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Norfolk Office |
| Norfolk City |
| Arenda L. Wright Allen |
| F. Bradford Stillman |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
OPINION AND FINAL ORDER - Denied finding as moot 70 Motion ; Denied finding as moot 71 Motion ; Denying 72 Motion for Default Judgment. For these reasons, the Court ORDERS the following: 1. The Plaintiffs claim of retaliation under Title VII as alleged in the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. The Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 72, as to her claim of retaliation under the ADA is GRANTED IN PART, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in t he amount of $721.25 for the Plaintiff only against the Defendant, Larchmont Baptist Church Infant Care Center, Inc. Although the Plaintiff has also moved for default judgment against Laura Reed and Kim Carmi, that part of the Motion, ECF No. 72, is DENIED because Reed and Carmi were both dismissed with prejudice as defendants in this case, see ECF No. 35. 3. Kim Carmi's Motions, ECF Nos. 70-71, are DENIED as MOOT. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard and filed on 7/8/13. Copies distributed to the parties and Kim Carmi 7/9/13. (ldab, )
|
|
Filing
59
OPINION AND ORDER 38 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Larchmont Baptist Church Infant Care Center, Inc.. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant's motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 38, is DENIED. An amended scheduling order setting this matt er for trial, among other things, will be forthcoming. The Clerk shall promptly mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman and filed on 9/11/12. Copies distributed to all parties 9/11/12.(ldab, )
|
|
Filing
30
Opinion and Order The Court GRANTS Larchmont's 23 Motion to Dismiss and ORDERS the following: 1. Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint alleging all relevant facts pertaining to her adverse treatment at Larchmont that began on or around Jul y 2009 on or before Friday, March 16, 2012. 2. Plaintiff shall attach, as exhibits to the Amended Complaint, the Charge of Discrimination that she filed with the EEOC and the Notice of Right to Sue that she received from the EEOC. She may also attac h any other documentation that supports her claim, including affidavits and declarations. 3. Larchmont shall respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint within the time allotted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3). Larchmont may attach supporting documentation, including affidavits and declarations, as exhibits to its responsive pleadings. 4. The Final Pretrial Conference and Jury Trial dates in this matter shall be vacated and rescheduled by the Court at a later date. 5. The Clerk shall promptly mail a copy of this Order to the Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman and filed on 2/29/2012. Copies distributed 3/01/12 as directed.(ldab, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
