Balas v. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit Virginia Eastern District Balas v. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

Balas v. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Karen B. Balas
Defendant:	Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2011cv00347
Filed:	June 21, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office:	Norfolk Office
County:	Chesapeake City
Presiding Judge:	Arenda L. Wright Allen
Presiding Judge:	F. Bradford Stillman
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 18, 2012	Filing 30 OPINION AND ORDER that Balas's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 21) and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 19) must be DENIED. Huntington Ingalls's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 16) is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Balas Motion to Consolidate Cases (Doc. 18) and a Motion for Issuance of Subpoenas (Doc. 29) are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and filed on 1/18/2012. Copies mailed to Plaintiff as directed.(rsim)
September 26, 2011	Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION that Huntington Ingalls's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to Count C of the Complaint (assault and battery) and as to the portion of Count A of the Complaint alleging retaliatory termination, and GRANTED as to Balas's rema ining claims. Additionally, Balas's request to amend Count B of her Complaint (wrongful discharge) is DENIED as futile. Accordingly, Count A of the Complaint (paras. 14-21), except insofar it alleges retaliatory termination, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Counts B and D of the Complaint (paras. 22-24, 27-28), respectively, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and filed on 9/26/2011. (rsim)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 18, 2012

Filing 30 OPINION AND ORDER that Balas's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 21) and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 19) must be DENIED. Huntington Ingalls's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 16) is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Balas Motion to Consolidate Cases (Doc. 18) and a Motion for Issuance of Subpoenas (Doc. 29) are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and filed on 1/18/2012. Copies mailed to Plaintiff as directed.(rsim)

September 26, 2011

Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION that Huntington Ingalls's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to Count C of the Complaint (assault and battery) and as to the portion of Count A of the Complaint alleging retaliatory termination, and GRANTED as to Balas's rema ining claims. Additionally, Balas's request to amend Count B of her Complaint (wrongful discharge) is DENIED as futile. Accordingly, Count A of the Complaint (paras. 14-21), except insofar it alleges retaliatory termination, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Counts B and D of the Complaint (paras. 22-24, 27-28), respectively, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and filed on 9/26/2011. (rsim)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Balas v. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karen B. Balas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
Represented By:	Dean Clement Berry
Represented By:	Scott William Kezman
Represented By:	Mark Edward Warmbier
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?