XVP Sports, LLC v. Bangs
Plaintiff: XVP Sports, LLC
Defendant: Gary Bangs
Case Number: 2:2011cv00379
Filed: July 5, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Norfolk Office
County: Virginia Beach City
Presiding Judge: Mark S. Davis
Presiding Judge: Douglas E. Miller
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 24 OPINION and ORDER adopting and approving the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, as supplemented by this Order; granting defendant Gary Bangs' motion for summary judgment. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 9/17/12. (mwin, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: XVP Sports, LLC v. Bangs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: XVP Sports, LLC
Represented By: Richard E. Gardiner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Bangs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?