Ramsey v. Runion

Ramsey v. Runion

Petitioner:	Charles Claude Ramsey
Respondent:	Kimberly H. Runion
Case Number:	2:2011cv00396
Filed:	July 13, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office:	Norfolk Office
County:	Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Rebecca Beach Smith
Presiding Judge:	F. Bradford Stillman
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 6, 2012	Filing 31 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk on 9/6/12 and mailed to all parties. (ldab, )
September 5, 2012	Filing 30 OPINION and FINAL ORDER: It is, therefore, ORDERED that the petition (ECF No. 10) be DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the reasons stated in the Report and modified herein. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16) shall be GRANTED, and judgment shall be entered in favor of Respondent. It is further ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (ECF No. 26) be DENIED, Respondent's Motion to Amend Her Objection (ECF No. 28) be GRANTED, and Petitioner's Mo tion to Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 27) be DENIED. Petitioner may appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to this Opinion and Final Order by filing a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of this court, United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, N orfolk, Virginia 23510, within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of judgment. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 2 8 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Therefore, the court, pu rsuant to Rule 22(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, declines to issue a certificate of appealability, and it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Issuance of a Certificate of Appealability (ECF No. 27) be DENIED. See Miller-E l v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-36 (2003). The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Opinion and Final Order to Petitioner and to counsel of record for Respondent. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 9/5/12. Copies distributed to all parties 9/6/12.(ldab, )

Date Filed

Document Text

September 6, 2012

Filing 31 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk on 9/6/12 and mailed to all parties. (ldab, )

September 5, 2012

Filing 30 OPINION and FINAL ORDER: It is, therefore, ORDERED that the petition (ECF No. 10) be DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the reasons stated in the Report and modified herein. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16) shall be GRANTED, and judgment shall be entered in favor of Respondent. It is further ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (ECF No. 26) be DENIED, Respondent's Motion to Amend Her Objection (ECF No. 28) be GRANTED, and Petitioner's Mo tion to Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 27) be DENIED. Petitioner may appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to this Opinion and Final Order by filing a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of this court, United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, N orfolk, Virginia 23510, within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of judgment. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 2 8 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Therefore, the court, pu rsuant to Rule 22(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, declines to issue a certificate of appealability, and it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Issuance of a Certificate of Appealability (ECF No. 27) be DENIED. See Miller-E l v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-36 (2003). The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Opinion and Final Order to Petitioner and to counsel of record for Respondent. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 9/5/12. Copies distributed to all parties 9/6/12.(ldab, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramsey v. Runion
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles Claude Ramsey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Kimberly H. Runion
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?