Brown v. Clarke

Brown v. Clarke

Petitioner:	Douglas Michael Brown, Jr.
Respondent:	Harold Clarke
Case Number:	2:2012cv00117
Filed:	March 2, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office:	Norfolk Office
County:	Augusta
Presiding Judge:	Douglas E. Miller
Presiding Judge:	Rebecca Beach Smith
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 3, 2014	Filing 36 ORDER. The Court ADOPTS 34 Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that the record be supplemented with the factual findings set forth above and returned to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals for further consideration in connection wi th Brown's pending proceedings in that court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to petitioner and to counsel of record for respondent. Signed by Chief District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on 1/3/2014. Copies mailed 1/3/2014. (jmey, )
December 20, 2012	Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 5 Motion to Dismiss filed by Harold Clarke, 12 Report and Recommendations. The court does hereby adopt the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation filed November 16, 2 012, and it is therefore ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED, and that the petition be DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of respondent. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on 12/20/2012; filed and copies distributed 12/21/2012. (bnew)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 3, 2014

Filing 36 ORDER. The Court ADOPTS 34 Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that the record be supplemented with the factual findings set forth above and returned to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals for further consideration in connection wi th Brown's pending proceedings in that court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to petitioner and to counsel of record for respondent. Signed by Chief District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on 1/3/2014. Copies mailed 1/3/2014. (jmey, )

December 20, 2012

Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 5 Motion to Dismiss filed by Harold Clarke, 12 Report and Recommendations. The court does hereby adopt the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation filed November 16, 2 012, and it is therefore ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED, and that the petition be DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of respondent. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on 12/20/2012; filed and copies distributed 12/21/2012. (bnew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Clarke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Harold Clarke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Douglas Michael Brown, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?