Medici888, Inc. v. Rileys Limited et al
| Medici888, Inc. |
| Hayleys Fibre, Hayleys PLC, Ravi Industries Limited and Rileys Limited |
| 2:2012cv00317 |
| June 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Norfolk Office |
| Norfolk City |
| Tommy E. Miller |
| Rebecca Beach Smith |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
FINAL ORDER: adopting Report and Recommendations re 32 Report and Recommendations. The court does hereby adopt and approve in full the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation of theUnited States Magistrate Judge fil ed July 29, 2014. It is Ordered that the plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED, pursuant to Federal rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. Copies mailed to Plaintiff on 8/22/2014. Signed by Chief District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 8/22/2014. (bgra)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER - The plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment againstdefendants, Hayleys PLC, Ravi Industries Limited, and Hayleys Fibreis DENIED, and further, based on plaintiff's counsel's request during the hearing on the Motion for Default Judgment, Count II of the Complaint is hereby DISMISSED. Signed by Chief District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on 10/3/13. (afar)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
