Intelligent Verification Systems, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation et al
| Intelligent Verification Systems, LLC |
| Microsoft Corporation and Majesco Entertainment Co. |
| 2:2012cv00525 |
| September 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Norfolk Office |
| Fairfax |
| Arenda L. Wright Allen |
| Tommy E. Miller |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
498
MEMORANDUM OPINION and Order (Redacted Version). Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard on 3/24/15. (afar)
|
|
Filing
384
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that IVS's Motion is DENIED with respect to IVS's request that the Court strike portions of the Bhagavatula Report. Regarding IVS's request that the Court limit the Defendants' invalidity arguments and prior art references, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that the Court DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE this request. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard and filed on 2/25/2015. (rsim, )
|
|
Filing
251
MEMORANDUM OPINION that IVS is entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees at the rate of $300 per hour for Mr. Corrie and $275 per hour for Mr. Marion, and that IVS is entitled to recover attorneys' fees for 15.75 hours for Mr. Marion's time, and for 12.3 hours for Mr. Corrie's time. IVS should be awarded reasonable attorneys' fees in the amount of $8,021.25 against Microsoft. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard and filed on 11/25/2014. (rsim, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
