Lismont v. Alexander Binzel Corporation et al
| Hedwig Lismont |
| Alexander Binzel Schweisstechnik GMBH & Co. KG, Alexander Binzel Corporation, IBG Industrie-Beteiligungs-GMBH & Co. KG, Richard Sattler and Abicor Unternehmensverwaltungs GMBH |
| 2:2012cv00592 |
| October 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Norfolk Office |
| Out of Country |
| Mark S. Davis |
| Lawrence R. Leonard |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part 118 Motion for Attorney Fees. Lismont is awarded $33,469 in attorneys' fees and $404.01 in costs, for a total award of $33,873.01. A copy of this order was forwarded to all counsel of record on 9/18/14. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard and filed on 9/18/14. (tbro)
|
|
Filing
122
OPINION and ORDER granting 66 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Copy distributed to all counsel of record on 8/20/14. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 8/20/14. (tbro)
|
|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 (b) (2), is GRANTED IN PART. Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) (6), is also GRANTED IN PART. Specifically, Abicor is DISMISSED as a de fendant in this case because the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over it, and Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint, alleging unjust enrichment under Virginia law, is DISMISEED as to all defendants because it is barred by the Virginia statute of limitations. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 11/18/13. (tbro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
